Editorial Policy

Our Commitment to Scientific Integrity

Transparency, accuracy, and evidence-based standards guide every piece of content we create.

Core Editorial Principles

Scientific Accuracy

All content is based on peer-reviewed research, clinical trials, and expert consensus. We prioritize:

  • Primary sources from reputable scientific journals
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses when available
  • Clinical trial data over observational studies
  • Recent research (prioritizing studies from the last 5 years)
  • Replication of findings across multiple studies
Source Citation

Every claim is backed by verifiable sources:

  • Direct links to original research papers
  • Clear attribution of study authors and institutions
  • Publication dates and journal names provided
  • DOI numbers included when available
  • Distinction between preliminary and established findings
Expert Review

Our Scientific Advisory Board reviews all content:

  • Medical and scientific accuracy verification
  • Appropriate context and interpretation of findings
  • Balance in presenting conflicting evidence
  • Clinical relevance and practical applicability
  • Safety warnings and contraindications
Transparency & Limitations

We clearly communicate research limitations:

  • Study size, design, and methodology constraints
  • Conflicts of interest or funding sources
  • Gaps in current research knowledge
  • Differences between animal and human studies
  • Preliminary findings vs. established evidence

Content Standards

Research Inclusion Criteria

Studies must meet these standards for inclusion:

  • Published in peer-reviewed journals
  • Clear methodology and statistical analysis
  • Appropriate sample sizes and controls
  • Ethical approval and informed consent
  • Reproducible methods and transparent data

Evidence Hierarchy

We prioritize evidence quality:

  1. Highest: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
  2. High: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
  3. Moderate: Cohort and case-control studies
  4. Lower: Case reports and expert opinion
  5. Lowest: Anecdotal evidence (noted as such)

Language & Accessibility

  • Plain language explanations of complex concepts
  • Technical terms defined on first use
  • Visual aids and infographics when helpful
  • Bullet points for easy scanning
  • Appropriate reading level for target audience
Content Update Policy

cannabis research evolves rapidly. We maintain content accuracy through:

  • Quarterly Reviews: All content reviewed every 3 months
  • Breaking Research: Significant findings added within 30 days
  • Corrections: Errors corrected immediately with transparent notation
  • Retractions: Content based on retracted studies removed promptly
  • Version History: Major updates documented with dates

Independence & Conflicts of Interest

Editorial Independence: Our content decisions are made solely based on scientific merit and public interest, free from commercial influence.

No Industry Funding: We do not accept funding from marijuana companies, pharmaceutical firms, or other entities that could influence content.

Advisor Disclosures: All advisory board members disclose potential conflicts of interest, which are reviewed annually.

Advertising Policy: Advertisements (if present) are clearly labeled and do not influence editorial content.

Questions About Our Editorial Policy?

We welcome feedback on our editorial standards and content accuracy.

Contact us at: [email protected]

Last Updated: February 2026 | This policy is reviewed and updated annually.